Performance Case Study  /  2026

Engineering an Acquisition Machine.

Client
Green Solar Energy Solutions
Solar Batteries  /  NSW, Australia  /  1300 086 552

Green Solar Energy Solutions had a narrow window. A government rebate reduction on 1 May created a closing market. AIIMS built the entire acquisition infrastructure from the ground up: landing page, creative, paid media, and call tracking. 2.5 months. One shot. Full execution.

333+ Inbound Calls
127 Meta Leads
642 Google Conversions
99.7% Call Answer Rate
Scroll
01   Executive Overview

The Window Was Closing.

The Australian solar battery market moves fast when policy moves faster. The federal government's rebate scheme had a confirmed reduction date: 1 May 2026. For Green Solar Energy Solutions, a Sydney-based solar and battery installer serving NSW homeowners, this represented the most commercially significant acquisition window in the company's recent history.

The Business

Green Solar Energy Solutions operates in the residential solar and battery storage segment, targeting homeowners looking to reduce energy costs, increase energy independence, and take advantage of government incentive schemes. The business had a quality product, credible installation capability, and a genuine market tailwind. What it lacked was an acquisition system capable of converting that tailwind into pipeline at scale.

The Opportunity

With the rebate deadline creating urgency across the homeowner market, demand was high and attention was primed. But opportunity without infrastructure is just noise. The strategic mandate was clear: build a complete, high-converting acquisition system, activate it immediately, and extract maximum lead volume before the window closed. Not over a quarter. In 2.5 months.

02   The Challenge

More Than a Marketing Problem.

The surface challenge was lead volume. But the real problem ran deeper. Every inefficiency in the acquisition system had a direct cost: wasted budget, diluted urgency, lower sales velocity. In a market with a hard deadline, every friction point was a commercial liability.

01
Positioning Weakness

The brand was competing in a crowded solar market without a distinct market position. No clear narrative thread connecting the homeowner's fear of missing out with a specific reason to act now with Green Solar.

02
No Acquisition Infrastructure

There was no dedicated landing page engineered for conversion. The existing web presence was built to explain the business, not to convert intent-driven traffic from paid media into booked consultations.

03
Conversion Leakage

Without a purpose-built funnel, paid traffic had nowhere structured to land. Clicks were being generated but the path from click to call to consultation was undefined and friction-heavy.

04
Trust Architecture Gaps

Solar battery installations represent significant financial decisions. Homeowners carry objections: cost, installer credibility, rebate complexity, battery longevity. None of these were being addressed proactively in the messaging.

05
Zero Call Visibility

Without call tracking, there was no way to attribute inbound phone leads to specific campaigns, channels, or creatives. Optimisation was impossible. Budget decisions were being made blind.

06
Urgency Not Weaponised

The government rebate deadline was the single most powerful conversion lever available. It was not being used. The messaging did not communicate urgency, scarcity, or the cost of inaction in any structured or strategic way.

03   Strategic Diagnosis

The Issue Wasn't Demand. It Was Capture.

Australia's residential solar and battery market had genuine demand. Google search trends, Meta audience sizes, and the volume of government rebate searches all confirmed homeowner intent was active. The problem was a system architecture unable to capture it.

"The issue wasn't traffic volume. It was message-to-intent alignment. Homeowners were ready to act. The funnel wasn't ready to receive them."

Behavioural Observations

Homeowners researching solar batteries in early 2026 were displaying high purchase intent signals. They were comparing quotes, researching rebate eligibility, and calculating payback periods. This is a customer who is already deep in the decision journey. The messaging needed to meet them at that stage, not educate them from scratch.

Funnel Diagnostics

The diagnosis identified four conversion breakdown points: (1) misaligned ad creative failing to trigger urgency, (2) landing page copy weighted toward features rather than financial outcomes, (3) no structured objection handling within the page architecture, and (4) call-to-action sequencing that did not escalate commitment progressively.

Offer Perception

The product itself was strong. The offer framing was not. Homeowners were not seeing a clear, time-sensitive value proposition. The rebate deadline needed to become the centrepiece of every touchpoint: ad headline, landing page hero, CTA language, and follow-up messaging. Time pressure, when framed ethically and accurately, is one of the most powerful conversion catalysts available.

Competitive Intelligence

The solar battery category in NSW was dominated by national installers running generic price-led advertising. The whitespace available to Green Solar was specificity: a local, responsive team with genuine expertise, able to act before the deadline. Local credibility plus urgency plus a clear outcome was the strategic foundation we built the entire acquisition system on.

04   Strategy Architecture

Five Pillars. One System.

The strategy was not a collection of tactics. It was a unified acquisition architecture where every component was designed to compound the others. Each pillar had a single job. Together they built a machine.

Pillar 01
Landing Page Reconstruction

A purpose-built, conversion-engineered landing page designed specifically for the rebate window campaign. Not a brochure. A conversion instrument with a singular goal: turn paid traffic into a qualified phone call or form submission within 90 seconds of landing.

Pillar 02
Conversion Copywriting

Every line of copy was engineered to address a specific psychological stage in the homeowner's decision journey. Headline engineering, benefit stacking, urgency framing, social proof placement, and objection neutralisation were all mapped against the customer's decision architecture.

Pillar 03
Paid Media Architecture

Dual-channel paid media strategy across Google and Meta, each channel serving a distinct role. Google Search captured in-market, high-intent searchers actively looking for solar battery installers. Meta generated awareness, remarketing, and instant lead forms for homeowners who were considering but not yet actively searching.

Pillar 04
Creative Strategy

Creative was not an afterthought. Ad creative was built around two axes: urgency (rebate deadline as the hero message) and credibility (local team, real installations, real outcomes). Every creative asset was designed to earn attention in less than two seconds and deliver a conversion-oriented message in the next five.

Pillar 05
Call Tracking Infrastructure

WildJar call tracking was deployed across all channels to give complete attribution visibility. Every inbound call was linked to the channel, campaign, and creative that generated it. This made budget allocation decisions data-driven rather than gut-driven, and enabled ongoing optimisation throughout the campaign period.

Pillar 06
Urgency Amplification

The 1 May rebate deadline was present in every touchpoint. Ad headlines. Landing page countdown context. CTA language. Email follow-ups. This was not manufactured scarcity. It was a real commercial event, communicated with precision. The entire system was calibrated to convert the market's existing urgency into Green Solar's pipeline.

Pillar 07
Video Production with Talent

Original video content was produced with on-screen talent to bring the Green Solar brand to life. Real faces, real stories, real installations. These weren't stock-footage ads. They were conversion-engineered creative assets distributed across Meta and YouTube, designed to build trust at scale and drive qualified homeowners deeper into the funnel.

 
05   Landing Page Reconstruction

Every Section Was Intentional.

The landing page was not designed. It was engineered. Every layout decision, every headline, every CTA placement had a specific conversion rationale. The philosophy was simple: reduce uncertainty at every step while increasing the perceived inevitability of taking action.

LP
Design Philosophy

"A homeowner landing on this page after clicking a Google ad has already expressed intent. Our job was not to sell solar batteries. It was to eliminate every reason not to call."

Narrative Hierarchy

The page was structured to mirror the homeowner's internal monologue: What is this? Why does it matter to me? Why now? Why this company? What do I do next? Each section answered one question precisely and moved the visitor to the next.

Headline Engineering

The hero headline led with the homeowner's outcome, not the product's feature. Financial savings, energy independence, and rebate eligibility were surfaced within the first 100 words. The subheadline delivered the deadline urgency without hyperbole.

Trust Architecture

Installer accreditations, past installation imagery, customer testimonials, and government scheme logos were positioned precisely at the decision friction points within the page. Trust was not concentrated at the bottom. It was distributed at every hesitation point.

CTA Sequencing

CTAs appeared three times on the page, each with escalating commitment language. The first offered a free quote. The second introduced the deadline context. The third created direct urgency with a call-to-action that framed inaction as a financial cost. Mobile click-to-call was the primary conversion mechanism throughout.

Objection Handling

The top five homeowner objections were identified: cost, process complexity, installation disruption, rebate eligibility uncertainty, and battery lifespan concern. Each was addressed in dedicated, scannable content blocks positioned before the visitor would naturally raise the objection in their own mind.

Mobile-First Execution

Over 85% of paid traffic arrived on mobile devices. The page was built mobile-first: thumb-reachable CTAs, tap-to-call buttons above the fold, compressed load time, and a visual hierarchy that communicated the core value proposition in a single scroll on a 375px screen.

06   Paid Media and Growth Systems

Precision Over Volume.

Two channels. Two distinct roles. One unified acquisition goal. The campaign architecture was designed to capture existing intent on Google while manufacturing urgency-driven intent on Meta. Both fed the same landing page. Both fed the same call tracking system. Data flowed in both directions.

 
Campaign Architecture Notes

Google's Performance Max campaign was deployed to extend reach across Search, Display, YouTube, and Maps simultaneously, while the dedicated search campaign maintained keyword-level control for the highest-intent queries. The dual-campaign structure allowed budget to flow toward whichever configuration was delivering the lowest cost per qualified call in any given period.

Meta's instant lead form campaign delivered $89.91 CPL with a 3.9% CTR against a 110,656 impression count. The traffic campaign, running to the landing page, generated 12,867 landing page views at $0.77 per landing page view. Together, both Meta campaigns reached 249,733 unique homeowners across the 2.5-month period.

07   Execution Timeline

2.5 Months. Zero Waste.

The engagement ran from mid-February to 1 May 2026. Every phase had a defined output and a defined transition trigger. Nothing moved forward until the preceding phase was production-ready.

Phase 01   /   Week 1–2   /   Feb 2026
Discovery and Strategic Architecture

Market audit, competitive landscape analysis, customer psychology mapping, and offer framing. The rebate deadline was identified as the central acquisition lever. Keyword research and audience segmentation completed. Campaign and landing page strategy locked before any creative production began.

Output: Strategy document, campaign briefs, landing page wireframe
Phase 02   /   Week 2–3   /   Feb–Mar 2026
Landing Page Build and Copywriting

Conversion-focused landing page designed and developed. All copy written to the conversion architecture: urgency-led hero section, benefit stacking, trust signals, objection handling blocks, and multi-stage CTA sequencing. WildJar call tracking integrated and tested across all traffic sources. Page QA completed on mobile and desktop.

Output: Live landing page, call tracking active, conversion events firing
Phase 02b   /   Week 2–3   /   Feb–Mar 2026
Video Production with Talent

On-screen talent was cast and briefed. Scripts were written to a conversion framework, not a brand awareness brief. Shoot days were completed efficiently, producing a library of short-form and long-form video assets. Each cut was edited for a specific placement: Meta feed, Meta Stories, and YouTube pre-roll. The urgency narrative was embedded in the talent's delivery, not added in post.

Output: Full video asset library, cut for Meta and YouTube distribution
Phase 03   /   Week 3–4   /   Mar 2026
Paid Media Activation

Google Ads campaigns launched: Performance Max and targeted search. Meta campaigns launched: lead generation and traffic. Initial creative set deployed. Conversion tracking verified across all channels. The first 7 days were treated as a calibration period, with active monitoring on impression share, click quality, and call attribution accuracy.

Output: Live campaigns across Google and Meta, first conversions recorded
Phase 04   /   Week 4–8   /   Mar–Apr 2026
Optimisation and Scale

Data from call tracking fed back into campaign optimisation. Underperforming ad sets paused. Budget reallocated to highest-converting campaigns. Creative refreshed based on click-through and engagement data. Landing page CTA and headline variants tested. As the rebate deadline approached, urgency language was amplified across all touchpoints.

Output: Sustained lead volume, declining cost-per-lead, rising call quality
Phase 05   /   Week 8–10   /   Apr–May 2026
Final Push and Deadline Capitalisation

The final 3 weeks before 1 May were the highest-volume period. Urgency messaging was at maximum intensity. Budget was weighted toward the highest-performing campaigns. Call volumes peaked. The system delivered its highest daily lead counts in the final week of April, exactly when the market's buying intent was at its sharpest.

Output: Peak campaign performance, maximum lead extraction before deadline
08   Results and Performance Impact

The Numbers Are Unambiguous.

Executive Summary
Across 2.5 months, AIIMS generated 333 qualified inbound calls, 127 Meta form leads, and 642 Google conversion events for Green Solar Energy Solutions. The acquisition system delivered a 99.7% call answer rate, with 184 qualified sales conversations and an average inbound call duration of 6 minutes 50 seconds.
WildJar Call Tracking
333 Inbound Calls. 99.7% Answered.
184 Qualified Leads
6m 50s Avg. Duration
276 First-Time Callers
Call tracking revealed that 83% of qualified calls originated from Google paid search, with the balance attributable to Meta and direct traffic. The average conversation ran nearly seven minutes, indicating genuine sales engagement rather than short, low-quality inquiries. First-time caller volume confirmed that the campaigns were reaching new audiences rather than recycling existing contacts.
Google Ads
642 Conversions. $42,300 Invested.
2.4M Impressions
22,361 Clicks
$1.89 Avg. CPC
The dual-campaign Google structure (Performance Max plus targeted search) delivered 642 conversion events across the campaign period. Performance Max generated high impression volume at $0.78 CPC across the Google network, while the dedicated search campaign targeted the highest-intent queries at $8.02 CPC, prioritising quality over cost efficiency. The 0.92% blended CTR on 2.4 million impressions reflects well-calibrated audience targeting and relevance signals.
Meta Ads
127 Leads. 794K Impressions. $21,382 Invested.
3.9% CTR (Leads Camp.)
$89.91 Cost Per Lead
249K Unique Reach
The Meta lead generation campaign drove 127 instant form lead submissions at an average CPL of $89.91, well within the target range for the solar battery category. A 3.9% CTR on the lead campaign significantly outperforms the platform average for home improvement and energy categories. The traffic campaign complemented by reaching 218,033 unique homeowners with 684,165 impressions at $14.56 CPM, generating 12,867 landing page views at $0.77 each.
Full-Funnel Performance Summary (Feb–May 2026)
Metric Google Ads Meta Ads Call Tracking
Total Spend $42,300 $21,382
Impressions 2,443,604 794,821
Clicks / Calls 22,361 19,690 333
Conversions / Leads 642 127 184 qualified
Avg. CTR / Answer Rate 0.92% 2.25% – 3.9% 99.7%
Avg. CPC / CPL $1.89 $89.91 (leads)
Unique Reach 249,733 276 first-time callers
All Channels
333
Inbound Calls
99.7% answer rate across campaign
Google Ads
642
Conversions
Across PMax and Search campaigns
Meta Ads
127
Form Leads
$89.91 avg. cost per lead
WildJar
184
Qualified Leads
6m 50s avg. conversation length
Google Ads
2.4M
Impressions
Across Search and PMax
Meta Ads
249K
Unique Reach
NSW homeowner audience
Meta (Leads)
3.9%
CTR
Above category benchmark
WildJar
276
First-Time Callers
New audience acquisition confirmed
09   Strategic Insights

What the Data Actually Said.

Every campaign teaches something. This one revealed several insights that extend well beyond the solar category. These are the strategic observations worth carrying forward.

  • Deadline as Architecture
    The 1 May rebate deadline was not just a marketing message. It was the structural logic of the entire funnel. Every touchpoint, headline, and CTA was sequenced relative to a specific date. This gave the entire system a coherent urgency narrative that most competitors in the solar category were failing to use with any precision.
  • Call Quality Outpaced Expectations
    The average inbound call ran for 6 minutes 50 seconds. In a category where typical solar inquiry calls average 3-4 minutes, this signal indicated that the landing page and ad creative were pre-qualifying visitors before they picked up the phone. Homeowners were arriving informed, specific, and ready to discuss. The funnel was doing the sales team's first five minutes for them.
  • Dual-Channel Compounding
    The Google-Meta combination created a compounding effect that neither channel would have produced alone. Google captured homeowners already searching. Meta reached homeowners who were not searching yet, manufactured the intent, and then fed them back into Google's remarketing ecosystem. The combined reach of 2.4M Google impressions and 794K Meta impressions meant the same homeowner was likely encountered across both channels, multiplying brand recall and urgency perception simultaneously.
  • Attribution Visibility Changed Decisions
    Before WildJar, every phone call was an unknown. After deployment, every call carried attribution data: channel, campaign, source, duration, and lead qualification. This transformed budget allocation from opinion to evidence. Campaigns that generated volume but poor call quality were identified and deprioritised. Campaigns generating fewer but higher-quality calls received increased budget. This optimisation loop is invisible without call tracking infrastructure.
  • The Competitor Oversight
    An audit of competitor solar advertising in the NSW market revealed that the majority were running generic, feature-led ad creative with no time-sensitive offer and no credible trust signals. The market was competing on who could say "solar batteries" loudest, not who could say it most relevantly. Green Solar's precision-targeted urgency messaging was operating in a largely uncontested strategic position.
  • Talent-Led Video Changed the Equation
    In a category where most competitors relied on static images and text overlays, talent-led video gave Green Solar an immediate credibility advantage. Faces build trust faster than logos. When a real person speaks directly to a homeowner's energy bill anxiety and frames the rebate deadline as a financial decision rather than a marketing offer, the conversion dynamic shifts. The Meta traffic campaign's 82,343 video views confirmed that the content earned attention, not just impressions.
10   Closing Statement

What began as a deadline became a system.

The 1 May rebate window closed. The acquisition infrastructure AIIMS built did not. Green Solar Energy Solutions entered this engagement needing lead volume. They emerged with a precision-engineered, data-attributed, multi-channel acquisition machine that is ready to scale beyond the rebate cycle.

333 inbound calls. 127 form leads. 642 Google conversions. 99.7% answered. The results are a function of the system, not the season. That distinction is what separates a campaign from infrastructure.

Work with AIIMS  
Green Solar Energy Solutions
1300 086 552  /  greensolarenergysolutions.com.au  /  AIIMS Group © 2026  /  Confidential

AIIMS™ – Australian Office Details

Unit 9/39 Gould Street
Strathfield South, NSW 2136
Australia
Phone: 1300397603
Secondary phone: 1300641849
Email: info@aiims.group